Architecture Review Boards are meant to improve consistency, reduce risk, and help teams make better technical decisions. In practice, they can also become slow, centralized, and difficult to scale.
In this hands-on workshop, participants will design a lightweight AI-assisted Architecture Review Board that brings architectural standards, ADRs, engineering principles, system constraints, and organizational knowledge directly into the decision process.
Iโll share how I use AI in my own architecture practice to structure analysis, surface relevant standards, explore alternatives, challenge assumptions, and expose trade-offs. Participants will then apply those ideas to build their own review workflow.
Weโll work through a realistic architectural decision and define what an AI-assisted review should evaluate, what context it needs, what questions it should ask, and when a decision should still require human review or escalation.
The goal is not to automate architecture governance. It is to make architectural guidance more accessible, consistent, and scalable while preserving the judgment and accountability of engineers and architects.
By the end of the workshop, participants will leave with a practical blueprint for an Architecture Review Board they can adapt to their own organization, standards, and level of governance maturity.